primary human dermal microvascular lecs (PromoCell)
Structured Review

Primary Human Dermal Microvascular Lecs, supplied by PromoCell, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 455 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/primary human dermal microvascular lecs/product/PromoCell
Average 96 stars, based on 455 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "Lymphatic exosomes promote dendritic cell migration along guidance cues"
Article Title: Lymphatic exosomes promote dendritic cell migration along guidance cues
Journal: The Journal of Cell Biology
doi: 10.1083/jcb.201612051
Figure Legend Snippet: Primary human LECs release EEVs. (a) Transmitted EM (TEM) of human skin LECs in situ (left: antipodoplanin-conjugated gold particles) and in vitro (middle and right). MVBs (middle, unstained) and exocytosis of CD63 + vesicles (right, anti-CD63–conjugated gold particles) into the basolateral stroma ( n ≥ 5). (b) Experimental setup to collect basolateral LEC culture supernatant from the lower chamber for the enrichment of basolateral EEVs (yellow dots). (c) TEM of vesicles of basolateral EEV fractions. Right: Anti-CD63–conjugated gold particles ( n ≥ 21). Bars, 100 nm. (d) Diameters of vesicles in basolateral EEV fractions collected from ss ( n = 21) and TNFα-stimulated LECs ( n = 26). Data are obtained from at least seven TEM images per experiment and from three independent experiments that were pooled for analysis (unpaired two-tailed t test with Welch’s correction). (e) BCA-derived protein concentrations of EEV fractions collected over 24 h from ss and TNFα-stimulated LECs in the absence or presence of 10 µM GW4869 ( n = 3; unpaired two-tailed t test). (f) Anti-CD9 immunoblot of EEV fractions from equal volumes of basolateral ss and TNFα-stimulated LEC culture supernatants ( n = 3). (g) Mean absolute vesicle numbers of EEV fractions isolated from 1 ml basolateral LEC culture supernatant of ss and TNFα-stimulated LECs ( n = 3; unpaired two-tailed t test). Left graph, vesicle numbers plotted against diameter size intervals; right graph, vesicle numbers of all sizes. (h) Coomassie blue–stained electrophoresis gel (top) and quantitation of relative protein abundance (as measured by densitometric analyses; bottom) of density gradient centrifugation subfractions of EEV fractions isolated from basolateral culture supernatants of ss and TNFα-stimulated LECs ( n = 3). (i) Anti-CD63–stained immunoblot (top) and quantitation of relative protein abundance (as measured by densitometric analyses; bottom) of density gradient centrifugation subfractions of EEV fractions isolated from basolateral culture supernatants of ss and TNFα-stimulated LECs ( n = 3). Values represent means ± SEM. ns, P > 0.05; *, P ≤ 0.05; **, P ≤ 0.01.
Techniques Used: In Situ, In Vitro, Two Tailed Test, Derivative Assay, Western Blot, Isolation, Staining, Electrophoresis, Quantitation Assay, Quantitative Proteomics, Gradient Centrifugation
Figure Legend Snippet: Proteomic profiling reveals a migration-promoting protein signature in TNFα EEV fractions. (a–d) EEV fractions from basolateral culture supernatants of ss ( n = 3) or TNFα-stimulated LECs ( n = 3) were proteomically profiled with TMT-based LC-MSMS analysis. (a) Heat map of all significantly (P < 0.05) quantified proteins of EEV fractions. Three left lanes: Replicate EEV fractions from ss LECs; three right lanes: Replicate EEV fractions from TNFα-stimulated LECs. Values in heat maps are log 10 of interprotein abundance of a given sample divided by the mean abundance of the three ss samples. (b) Ratio density plot of EEV fractions from ss and TNFα-stimulated LECs. X axis: Log 10 ratio of interprotein abundance of TNFα-EEV fractions over ss-EEV fractions. Y axis: Relative number of proteins. (c) The quantitatively identified proteins of EEV fractions were grouped into biologically relevant clusters according to the databases of ExoCarta (exosomes), EVpedia (extracellular vesicles), and the Gene Ontology Consortium (cellular components). Mean interprotein abundances of proteins in the respective clusters were compared with the mean interprotein abundance of all proteins in ss-EEV fractions (red dotted line) and TNFα-EEV fractions (blue dotted line). X axis: Logarithmic scale of interprotein abundances. Y axis: Biologically relevant clusters. For each cluster, the floating bars display the minimum-to-maximum intervals of the interprotein abundance for ss-EEV (red) and TNFα-EEV (blue) fractions. Vertical lines show the mean interprotein abundance for ss-EEV (red) and TNFα-EEV (blue) fractions. **, P < 0.01; *** P ≤ 0.001. (d) Heat maps of significantly (P < 0.05) quantified proteins of EEV fractions that are either endothelial markers or chemokines and growth factors.
Techniques Used: Migration
Figure Legend Snippet: Induction of protrusion formation and enhancement of directional migration by TNFα-EEV fractions is dependent on GPCR signaling and CX3CL1. (a) Quantitation of transmigrated human mature MMDCs from the upper cell culture insert into the lower chamber well of a transwell assay. PTX-treated or untreated MMDCs were loaded together with EEV-free supernatants or TNFα-EEV fractions into the upper cell culture insert ( n = 3; unpaired two-tailed t test). (b) Immunofluorescence of CX3CL1 (green) and ALIX (red; left) or CD9 (red; right) in primary human LECs. Cell nuclei are stained with DAPI (blue; n = 5). Yellow regions of interest were used for Manders colocalization analyses. White region of interest is a zoom. Arrows indicate colocalization of CX3CL1 with either ALIX or CD9. (c) Immunofluorescence of the lymphatic vessel marker podoplanin (green) and CX3CL1 (red) in human renal transplant rejections (fluorescence profiles across the respective vessels are plotted beneath the merged images; x axis: cross-sectional distance; y axis: CX3CL1- or podoplanin-specific mean immunofluorescence intensities; n = 6). Bars, 5 µm. (d) Anti-CX3CL1 immunoblot of ss-EEV fractions and TNFα-EEV fractions probed with an antibody to the C terminus of CX3CL1 ( n = 5). Molecular masses are given in kilodaltons. (e) Flow cytometry contour plot of unstained beads, isotype control IgG-coated beads stained with fluorescent SYTO RNASelect-labeled TNFα-EEV fractions and anti-CX3CL1 IgG-coated beads stained with fluorescent SYTO RNASelect-labeled TNFα-EEV fractions. X axis indicates forward scatter. Y axis indicates mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of SYTO RNASelect–labeled EEVs ( n = 6). (f) Quantitation of SYTO RNASelect MFI of beads described in e ( n = 6; unpaired two-tailed t test). (g) Quantitation of transmigrated MMDCs from the upper cell culture insert into the lower chamber well of a transwell assay. MMDCs were loaded together with EEV-free supernatants or TNFα-EEV fractions and control IgGs or anti-CX3CL1 IgGs into the upper cell culture insert ( n = 3; unpaired two-tailed t test). (h) Quantitation of transmigrated MMDCs from the upper cell culture insert into the lower chamber well of a transwell assay. MMDCs were loaded together with EEV-free supernatants or TNFα-EEV fractions derived from 5-mispair control morpholino oligonucleotide–treated LECs or CX3CL1-specific morpholino oligonucleotide–treated LECs into the upper cell culture insert ( n = 2; unpaired two-tailed t test). (i) Migration analyses of MMDCs in a 3D collagen matrix migration assay. Cells were exposed to gradients of EEV-free supernatants plus CCL19 ( n = 1,070), TNFα-EEV fractions derived from 5-mispair control morpholino oligonucleotide–treated LECs plus CCL19 ( n = 654) or TNFα-EEV fractions derived from CX3CL1-specific morpholino oligonucleotide–treated LECs plus CCL19 ( n = 958). Red columns indicate chemotactic displacement. Blue columns indicate chemotactic index. Data are obtained from at least 218 cell tracks per experiment and three independent experiments that were pooled for analysis (unpaired two-tailed t test with Welch’s correction). (j) Migration analyses of MMDCs in a confined microenvironment migration assay in the presence of EEV-free supernatants ( n = 1,464), TNFα-EEV fractions derived from 5-mispair control morpholino oligonucleotide–treated LECs ( n = 9,380), or TNFα-EEV fractions derived from CX3CL1-specific morpholino oligonucleotide–treated LECs ( n = 5,588). Red columns indicate circularity of cell shape. Blue columns indicate migratory angle change. Green columns indicate speed of migration. Data are obtained from at least 488 time points and from three independent experiments that were pooled for analysis (unpaired two-tailed t test with Welch’s correction). Values represent means ± SEM. ns, P > 0.05; *, P ≤ 0.05; **, P ≤ 0.01; ***, P ≤ 0.001.
Techniques Used: Migration, Quantitation Assay, Cell Culture, Transwell Assay, Two Tailed Test, Immunofluorescence, Staining, Marker, Fluorescence, Western Blot, Flow Cytometry, Control, Labeling, Derivative Assay
